Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Pay for Performance: Make 'em Earn It, Darn It

Ask any aspiring politician how he feels about teacher salaries, and he'll give you the right answer. It was Evan Esar who once said, "America believes in education: the average professor earns more money in a year than a professional athlete earns in a whole week." You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who believes teacher salaries are sufficient, not to mention the virtual non-existence of those believing teachers are paid too much. I believed it can be argued, however, that some teachers are, in fact, over-paid.

The new trend in the teacher salary debate is not simply a need to increase compensation in general, but rather to increase compensation for those teachers who are deserving. Brooke Dollens Terry, a policy analyst for the Center of Educational Policy, addresses this issue in a recent publication entitled, "Applying Free Market Principles and Common Sense to Teacher Compensation." The idea is simple: rather than paying teachers based on a standard salary schedule that increases compensation based on years of experience and advanced degrees alone, apply the performance-based principles that have worked for Fortune 500 companies for decades. Reward employees monetarily based on the results of their labor, rather then their labor alone.

Through my six years of teaching experience, I've known both exceptional teachers and below average teachers. Both types of teachers have one thing in common: they are evaluated based on a limited observation by an administrator, and while this observation may result in a non-renewal of contract (only in extremely rare and drastic situations) it does not have any affect on the teacher's salary. Salary is simply determined, as noted in Ms. Terry's article, by the amount of years a teacher has been in the classroom.

Ms. Terry does successfully identify the reasons performance pay is needed in public schools. She fails to address, however, as most policy analysts do, substantial suggestions for criteria upon which to base this said performance. She quotes studies that reveal not only that "teachers reach full effectiveness after four years... (and that) a teacher with 25 years of experience is no more effective than a teacher with 15 years of experience," but also "that possession of a master’s or doctorate degree has no impact on teacher effectiveness and does not translate into increased learning in the classroom." Should this be true, then on what criteria, exactly, should we be basing performance pay?

Observation alone, especially limited observation, should never be the sole determinate of a teacher's salary, though it most definitely could play a part. Classroom observations and along with other ideas for performance pay criteria are outlined below:
  • Combine administrator observation with department chair observations. Department chairs are more closely involved with individual teachers, especially in large schools, working on curriculum development and alignment, assessment evaluation, utilization of departmental resources, etc. My first department chair new my weaknesses as a first year teacher better than anyone. However, my current department chair has bared witnesses to some of my greatest successes in recent years. If teacher salaries are to be based in part by administrator evaluations, they must be done by those administrators or campus leaders that are most directly supervise those teachers.
  • Student Performance. I must say, for the better part of my school policy study, I have been adamantly against basing teacher pay on student performance. I like the dentist metaphor, which states that a dentist cannot be judged based on the health of his patient's teeth because he has no bearing on how the patient cares for his teeth outside of his office. So many outside variables affect a student's performance that are out of a teacher's scope of influence. However, I do believe a school or administrator can identify trends in student performance. Was a teacher able to raise the average scores of her students on standardized scores in a low performing school? Was she able to help her students maintain high scores at a traditionally high performing school? I, in no way, believe student performance should be the only factor, but do believe it should be taken into consideration.
  • Peer/Student evaluation. For fear of personal interests or opinions, evaluations of teachers by their students and peers have been generally avoided. College campuses often ask students to evaluate their professors, yet we feel that secondary and elementary students are unable to evaluate the quality of instruction they receive from their teachers. I believe that with the right medium of evaluation and in the appropriate setting, these evaluations could prove to be incredibly valuable. I know that if I thought my students were writing evaluations of my performance that would be submitted to my administrator, I might think twice the next time I assign busy work because I don't have the energy to attempt to authentically engage my students that day.
  • Advance degrees and professional development. While Ms. Terry discusses findings that discount a relationship between student performance and teacher education, as a teacher with a graduate degree, I would have to disagree. I personally experienced the improvement of my teaching ability over the three years I was in graduate school and after. I strongly believe the training I received during that degree program helped me to better understand the operations on my campus and how I could better utilize the resources available to help my students. I also believe professional development is essential for any teacher that wishes to continue to grow and change with the continually growing and changing needs of her students. Rewarding a teacher based on her efforts to expand her own education only seems to make sense.
I'm interested to hear what other suggestions those inside and outside the education industry have for performance pay criteria. If school districts are going to take this idea seriously, they must be presented with concrete plan of action, firm directions for which to implement this idea. An obvious step in successful implementation would have to be fostering a more performance-based culture among public schools, but before we can even go that direction, we have to sell the idea to those who have the power to enforce it. While the ideas and the sentiments expressed by policy analysts such as Ms. Terry make us want to say "Yes! Make a change!", they neglect to show us exactly how.

5 comments:

  1. I really like the idea behind creating a level of competition that rewards teachers beyond just being there for an extended period of time. After attending public school in Georgia (generally considered one of the worst state school systems) I saw plenty of teachers who had reached their tenure salary and, with likely no further increases in pay coming their way, pretty much mailed it in.

    While you would know much better than I what criteria should be involved in teacher evaluation, I think you're facing a huge uphill battle with the teacher's union in this country. They would never allow pay decrease or outright termination simply for poor teaching performance no matter what metric you use to evaluate them. Once elected, a politician will immediately try to figure out how to get re-elected, and the support of the teacher's union is always coveted by those in power. A teaching pay scale more reflective of any private sector industry or service provider would almost guarantee a higher quality of education, but would require a culture where teachers are motivated at least somewhat by the fear of losing their job. Right now, short of physically assaulting a student, teachers are pretty much safe as far as job security goes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow...I couldn't agree with you more! Very well said...all of the things that you mentioned to be considered for compensation pay were excellent! I loved reading this! Awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  3. (It should be noted that I have not thought this out at all)

    With that being said, in my experience mentoring a 5th grader, I've learned two things:
    1. The kids may be able to pass a standardized test, but they they still don't know anything. And when they fail the tests, its not the test's fault, they really just don't know anything.
    2. Kids love money

    I think we should abandon the "teach to the test" methodology and pay for grades. Incent the kids to learn on their own and the parents to get involved so their kids get the cashola. It may be expensive now, but its cheaper than an entire generation that only knows how to eliminate two ridiculous answers and flip a coin on the other two.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought about this, Rudy, when I was teaching summer school, since they all had to pay per session/per class. I WILL say that the parents were more inclined to motivate their students to stay on top of their work, but that didn't necessarily mean they knew the right way to motivate their kid. So he came to school, slapped some answers down on paper, and completed the work. Doesn't mean he actually learned something. I think it takes teachers to some how find what it takes to intrinsically motivate those kids, and those teachers that can do it, have to be compensated either monetarily or otherwise in order to keep them in the profession.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shelby,

    I'm impressed! Congratulations...

    Having also worked 6 yrs in the education field, my "expertice" somehow in the world of ESOL, i agree with a grat deal of your ideas here presented.

    Pay for advanced degrees, peer and/or student evaluations, a decrease in CEI or whatever indicees a disctrict abides by (if not already contested in court), yet sadly, the education system (historically known to abide to the TWWADI system: the way we've always done it)

    We will be hard pressed to go away from the "student perfomance" and "teaching to the test" mentality that has persisted for over 20 yrs now!

    As for greater filtering of observations and/or evaluations, think of monetary and time resources. and althogh we'd hate to think that even "department heads" are just that - a "head" - does not mean that they, too, also grow apathetic and the kids and the administration! it's a systemic and insidious problem!

    ReplyDelete